oi oi, gimana pendapat lu orang tentang buku 7 habit for effective people??
bagus ga sih.. gw baru2 ini baca buku awaken the giant within (anthony robbins)
gw recommended bgt nih... hehe....
Full Version: 7TH HABIT(TANYA PENDAPAT)
bagus banget... malahan gw nyesel ga baca buku ini di awal masa remaja gw.. (ya iyalah.. di awal masa remaja lom keluar)....
merangkum hal2 "biasa" didalam hidup kita yang tidak begitu kita perhatikan tapi sebenarnya sangat penting untuk menuju kesuksesan
merangkum hal2 "biasa" didalam hidup kita yang tidak begitu kita perhatikan tapi sebenarnya sangat penting untuk menuju kesuksesan
jempol untuk 7 habit, bagi saya buku ini termasuk sangat penting dalam pembentukan karakter dan penelusuran tujuan hidup yang lebih terfokus.
topik2 seperti perubahan paradigma, mengasah kapak, menebang dengan arah dan tujuan yg jelas, dan lain2
ini bukan buku yang cuma sekali baca lalu di"lengser" di rak koleksi buku2, tapi leibh cocok ditaruh di rak buku2 panduan yg sering dibuka lagi dan dibuka lagi seperti yellow pages
juga buku yg cocok untuk diberikan sebagai kado ... lebih berharga drpd uang hehehe... at least i do.
topik2 seperti perubahan paradigma, mengasah kapak, menebang dengan arah dan tujuan yg jelas, dan lain2
ini bukan buku yang cuma sekali baca lalu di"lengser" di rak koleksi buku2, tapi leibh cocok ditaruh di rak buku2 panduan yg sering dibuka lagi dan dibuka lagi seperti yellow pages
juga buku yg cocok untuk diberikan sebagai kado ... lebih berharga drpd uang hehehe... at least i do.
bagus2.. recommended lah, tp klo mau bli lbh baik cari yang bahasa inggrisnya, klo yang terjemahan lumayan aneh terjemahannya(kurang bagus sulit dicerna otak) hehe... klo dapet e-book nya lbh bagus lagi, dapet yang inggris + gratis lage. : )
he2... gw ud bc akhir jaman kuliah.. skt th 2002... and bagus bgnt, cukup inspiring.. tp klo mo beli sih gw saranin bli yg keluaran baru "8th habits".. trus lanjutin pake buku who's moved my cheese... wah nanti jadi asyik tu...
ini udah ada topicnya ..8habits http://www.bluefame.com/index.php?showtopic=55489
kl gw sh lbih sreg sm 7habits for highly effective teen.. bahasa lbh lugas n dbumbuin komedi jd lbh asik..
QUOTE (reefbro @ Oct 27 2008, 12:35 AM) 
kl gw sh lbih sreg sm 7habits for highly effective teen.. bahasa lbh lugas n dbumbuin komedi jd lbh asik..
Kalo ga salah yang Seven Habit for Highly Effective Teen yang nulis anaknya Stephen Covey juga ya..kalo ga salah ya..
gw sih ngrekomen juga yang buat mereka yang udah merit atau mau merit untuk baca: 7 habit to be highly effective family...cool. Prefacenya bilang: keluarga itu seperti pesawat. Pilot and co-pilot boleh sama sama pinter. Tapi kalo ga punya flight plan, pesawat bisa terbang gak jelas, kena turbulensi sana sini, dan ga nyampe airport yang dituju..original banget perumpamaannya. Gw sih rekomen suer.
da e booknya g?????
minta doonnkk
minta doonnkk
cukup baca prolog nya aja udah bener2 ngasih pencerahan...
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!! jadiin kitab suci ke 2
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!! jadiin kitab suci ke 2
ada yg bisa kasih pencerahan d mana TKP nya............
Langsung aja ke sini bro
Bagian 1
http://rapidshare.com/files/106647061/8th_habit_bag1_pdf.pdf
Bagian 2
http://rapidshare.com/files/106647062/8th_habit_bag2_pdf.pdf
Bagian 1
http://rapidshare.com/files/106647061/8th_habit_bag1_pdf.pdf
Bagian 2
http://rapidshare.com/files/106647062/8th_habit_bag2_pdf.pdf
e book yang 7th habits donk please!
buku keren tuh...
bro....minta versi pdf nya dooonkk....
bingung...hari gini mo nyari yg jual bukunya dmn...
pliisss y brooo.....
versi pdf nyaahhh...
bingung...hari gini mo nyari yg jual bukunya dmn...
pliisss y brooo.....
versi pdf nyaahhh...
King Arthur and the "roots of troubles"
The traditional treatment of women in the Arthurian saga is interesting to note in its severity. Guinevere is an adulteress, Morgan Le Fay is a witch, Morgause is an incestuous schemer, and the Lady of the Lake is the leader of a terrible, backward pagan religion. This is, of course, the treatment that has been handed down to us from the medieval writers who gave us the Christian infusion that spawned the story of the Holy Grail. ffxi gil
But if we go back to the historical writers——the writers who were treating Arthur as a historical character, not a target for pious retribution or moral sermonizing; we find that women do, more or less, have quite an important role to play in the overall health and well-being of Arthur the King.
Inherent in this last statement is this feature of earlier stories: Arthur's story did not end badly. In the earliest of stories about Arthur the King, he wasn't even the Once and Future King. He was a great warrior and won many great victories. He was a great king who had a great queen, and they both ruled a great kingdom.
maple story mesos,Arthur's queen didn't even have a name in the earliest of stories. She was simply the queen. But she didn't, as so many modern stories tell us, have a part in the downfall of the kingdom. Even Geoffrey of Monmouth, in the happier parts of his story, has Arthur and Ganhumara (his name for the queen) holding court in a great castle in a great city called the City of the Legions. (Geoffrey later gives Guinevere a bad name, but she is all that glitters when the story opens.)
Also showered with the light of good in earlier stories is Morgan Le Fay. In the earliest of the Cornwall stories, Morgan is the Queen of Lyonesse, where Arthur is taken after his final battle. Morgan is the leader of a group of healers, all women, who will undoubtedly heal Arthur. It is perhaps out of this part of the story that William of Malmesbury crafted his vision that Arthur would come again. (William, you will remember, is the first one to mention that Arthur's grave has not been found; even though he says nothing more, he gives a strong hint that the Once and Future King part of the legend has begun.) wow gold
The Lady of the Lake as well fares rather better in the older stories. She it was who gave Arthur his first sword. She it is who is guardian of the old ways, the ways from which comes much of the magic of the original Arthurian stories. The Christian writers wanted to make Arthur a Christian king, and they didn't want any other religions getting in the way of this. Naturally, they made the Lady of the Lake a questionable character solely because of her "religious" ways.
The question then becomes one of why. Why do the women come off so bad in medieval stories? What happened to make the writers change their image of people who were so vital to the story? The answer probably lies in the spiritual realm and its resulting scriptures. The same writers who were reading the Bible and discovering that Eve was responsible for all the world's problems probably thought that they should blame Guinevere for all of Arthur's problems. Why did Arthur have a bastard son in the first place? wow gold, Because the scheming Morgause tricked him into it. Why did Morgan Le Fay hate Arthur so? Because she was jealous of the magic wielded by Merlin, Arthur's advisor. Why was the Lady of the Lake suddenly to be reviled, not revered? Because she was the head of a religion that medieval writers didn't understand or want to understand. The teachings of the Bible were such that one religion was possible (in the minds of these writers); anything else was unacceptable. (It must be said here that Arthur, Lancelot, and all the rest of the male characters take quite a beating at the hands of the medievalists as well. The whole story becomes a morality play from which only Galahad, the purse and chaste, emerges unscathed. Arthur and Lancelot, the perfect king and the perfect knight, are undone by their shared imperfect morality.)
ffxi gil, The result is that in the modern tales, women are still pretty much blamed for Arthur's troubles. Arthur's dallying with Morgause has come to be seen as something akin to the Adam and Eve story. Lancelot's love for the queen has come to be seen as equal in its devastation to the queen's own adulterous actions (that is to say, it's the woman's fault). Morgan Le Fay is reviled as a witch who wants nothing more than to ruin the kingdom of the wonderful Arthur. And the Lady of the Lake recedes ever further into the background. (Some traditions hold that she is Nimue, whose claim to "fame" is that she enchants Merlin into submission and takes him from Arthur when Arthur needs him most.)
If you want to role-play in Arthur's world, you'd better choose a male character. At least people will feel sorry for you. aion gold
The traditional treatment of women in the Arthurian saga is interesting to note in its severity. Guinevere is an adulteress, Morgan Le Fay is a witch, Morgause is an incestuous schemer, and the Lady of the Lake is the leader of a terrible, backward pagan religion. This is, of course, the treatment that has been handed down to us from the medieval writers who gave us the Christian infusion that spawned the story of the Holy Grail. ffxi gil
But if we go back to the historical writers——the writers who were treating Arthur as a historical character, not a target for pious retribution or moral sermonizing; we find that women do, more or less, have quite an important role to play in the overall health and well-being of Arthur the King.
Inherent in this last statement is this feature of earlier stories: Arthur's story did not end badly. In the earliest of stories about Arthur the King, he wasn't even the Once and Future King. He was a great warrior and won many great victories. He was a great king who had a great queen, and they both ruled a great kingdom.
maple story mesos,Arthur's queen didn't even have a name in the earliest of stories. She was simply the queen. But she didn't, as so many modern stories tell us, have a part in the downfall of the kingdom. Even Geoffrey of Monmouth, in the happier parts of his story, has Arthur and Ganhumara (his name for the queen) holding court in a great castle in a great city called the City of the Legions. (Geoffrey later gives Guinevere a bad name, but she is all that glitters when the story opens.)
Also showered with the light of good in earlier stories is Morgan Le Fay. In the earliest of the Cornwall stories, Morgan is the Queen of Lyonesse, where Arthur is taken after his final battle. Morgan is the leader of a group of healers, all women, who will undoubtedly heal Arthur. It is perhaps out of this part of the story that William of Malmesbury crafted his vision that Arthur would come again. (William, you will remember, is the first one to mention that Arthur's grave has not been found; even though he says nothing more, he gives a strong hint that the Once and Future King part of the legend has begun.) wow gold
The Lady of the Lake as well fares rather better in the older stories. She it was who gave Arthur his first sword. She it is who is guardian of the old ways, the ways from which comes much of the magic of the original Arthurian stories. The Christian writers wanted to make Arthur a Christian king, and they didn't want any other religions getting in the way of this. Naturally, they made the Lady of the Lake a questionable character solely because of her "religious" ways.
The question then becomes one of why. Why do the women come off so bad in medieval stories? What happened to make the writers change their image of people who were so vital to the story? The answer probably lies in the spiritual realm and its resulting scriptures. The same writers who were reading the Bible and discovering that Eve was responsible for all the world's problems probably thought that they should blame Guinevere for all of Arthur's problems. Why did Arthur have a bastard son in the first place? wow gold, Because the scheming Morgause tricked him into it. Why did Morgan Le Fay hate Arthur so? Because she was jealous of the magic wielded by Merlin, Arthur's advisor. Why was the Lady of the Lake suddenly to be reviled, not revered? Because she was the head of a religion that medieval writers didn't understand or want to understand. The teachings of the Bible were such that one religion was possible (in the minds of these writers); anything else was unacceptable. (It must be said here that Arthur, Lancelot, and all the rest of the male characters take quite a beating at the hands of the medievalists as well. The whole story becomes a morality play from which only Galahad, the purse and chaste, emerges unscathed. Arthur and Lancelot, the perfect king and the perfect knight, are undone by their shared imperfect morality.)
ffxi gil, The result is that in the modern tales, women are still pretty much blamed for Arthur's troubles. Arthur's dallying with Morgause has come to be seen as something akin to the Adam and Eve story. Lancelot's love for the queen has come to be seen as equal in its devastation to the queen's own adulterous actions (that is to say, it's the woman's fault). Morgan Le Fay is reviled as a witch who wants nothing more than to ruin the kingdom of the wonderful Arthur. And the Lady of the Lake recedes ever further into the background. (Some traditions hold that she is Nimue, whose claim to "fame" is that she enchants Merlin into submission and takes him from Arthur when Arthur needs him most.)
If you want to role-play in Arthur's world, you'd better choose a male character. At least people will feel sorry for you. aion gold
recommended deh buku ini,
gw juga sempat ikut kursusnya (by Dunamis), mantab !!!
Rasanya sempat lihat di Yogya deh (Togamas atau Social Agency)
gw juga sempat ikut kursusnya (by Dunamis), mantab !!!
Rasanya sempat lihat di Yogya deh (Togamas atau Social Agency)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.